Evidence of meeting #104 for Environment and Sustainable Development in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was pfas.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Martin Bureau  Vice-President, Innovation and Head of the PFAS Center of Excellence, ALTRA
Anna Warwick Sears  Executive Director, Okanagan Basin Water Board
Nadine Stiller  Chair, Prairie Provinces Water Board
Fréderic Lasserre  Full Professor, Université Laval, As an Individual
Roy Brouwer  Professor and Executive Director, Water Institute, University of Waterloo, As an Individual
Haidy Tadros  Strategic Advisor, Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission
Melissa Fabian Mendoza  Director, Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission

5:15 p.m.

Conservative

Branden Leslie Conservative Portage—Lisgar, MB

I'll use my time to move a motion that was put on notice last Friday.

5:15 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

Could you just stop for a second? I have to take down the....

Go ahead, Mr. Leslie.

5:15 p.m.

Conservative

Branden Leslie Conservative Portage—Lisgar, MB

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

I'm referring to the motion that “The committee report to the House its recommendation that the Liberal Government abolish the consumer carbon levy, more commonly referred to as the carbon tax.”

Premiers and leaders of all political backgrounds have come out opposed to the Prime Minister's 23% carbon tax hike, and there is clearly momentum and a growing groundswell of support to scrap—

5:20 p.m.

Liberal

Sophie Chatel Liberal Pontiac, QC

I have a point of order.

It's just on the terminology. I don't think it is a tax, according to the Supreme Court, when the money is put back into the pockets of families.

5:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

Well, I know this is a point of debate.

5:20 p.m.

Liberal

Adam van Koeverden Liberal Milton, ON

Using proper terminology is important.

5:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

Yes, it's important. However, people will debate it until kingdom come.

5:20 p.m.

Liberal

Sophie Chatel Liberal Pontiac, QC

The Supreme Court ruled that when you take a levy and it's paid back to people, it's not a tax.

5:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

I understand.

Go ahead, Mr. Leslie.

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

Branden Leslie Conservative Portage—Lisgar, MB

I will be sure to correct it when Liberal ministers screw up in the House of Commons and accidentally call it a carbon tax instead of a price on pollution. I will call them out on it, absolutely.

5:20 p.m.

Liberal

Sophie Chatel Liberal Pontiac, QC

No, you can't. It's a Supreme Court decision.

5:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

Mr. Leslie has the floor.

Go ahead, Mr. Leslie.

April 18th, 2024 / 5:20 p.m.

Conservative

Branden Leslie Conservative Portage—Lisgar, MB

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

As I was saying, there is clearly momentum and a groundswell of support to scrap the carbon tax once and for all. From Liberals to NDPers to Conservatives, there is now an emerging consensus that the Prime Minister's 23% carbon tax hike was wrong and is punishing hard-working everyday Canadians across this country.

While the rural member from Milton likes to accuse anyone who disagrees with him of being a climate change denier, I don't think he would say that about the Liberal premier from Newfoundland and Labrador, and I hope he wouldn't accuse the over 130 first nations in Ontario that are taking the government to court over the carbon tax of that. He seems to save that vitriol for Conservative MPs, who are proudly standing up for their constituents and their views.

That's not to say that the Liberal government hasn't attacked the Liberal premier from Newfoundland and Labrador. The premier actually just came out publicly stating that the—

5:20 p.m.

Liberal

Leah Taylor Roy Liberal Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill, ON

I have a point of order.

I'm just wondering, given our time constraints, what the relevance of these comments are to the motion he's putting forward. They seem to be very politically motivated, and he was putting forth a motion on the carbon tax—or the price on pollution, rather, as there is no carbon tax.

5:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

Yes, I would agree that it's politically motivated.

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

Branden Leslie Conservative Portage—Lisgar, MB

I'm sorry. You're saying, of course, it's not a carbon tax. Isn't that right?

5:20 p.m.

Liberal

Leah Taylor Roy Liberal Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill, ON

No, it's not. It's a price on pollution—

5:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

Order. Colleagues, we have guests today—

5:20 p.m.

Liberal

Leah Taylor Roy Liberal Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill, ON

Your motion refers to it as such, but you're right. It is not, and I'm glad you acknowledged that.

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

Branden Leslie Conservative Portage—Lisgar, MB

Absolutely.

5:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

Colleagues, we have guests, and we want to be on our best behaviour.

That wasn't a point of order.

Go ahead, Mr. Leslie.

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

Branden Leslie Conservative Portage—Lisgar, MB

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

I was just saying that the Premier of Newfoundland just publicly stated that the “prime minister has tried to bait [him] with certain ad hominems and name-calling”. I don't think the Liberal members on this committee would call the NDP Premier of Manitoba names for opposing the carbon tax, nor the Saskatchewan NDP leader.

Therefore, instead of....

5:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

Have you read your motion yet?

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

Branden Leslie Conservative Portage—Lisgar, MB

It was on notice, so I just read the summary of it. I could happily read it into the record, if you'd like, but I just wanted—

5:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

No, it's all right.