Evidence of meeting #94 for Finance in the 41st Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site.) The winning word was chair.
A video is available from Parliament.
1:55 p.m.
Liberal
Scott Brison Liberal Kings—Hants, NS
Mr. Chair, I'd like to have a recorded vote on 165-326.
(Amendment negatived [See Minutes of Proceedings])
1:55 p.m.
Liberal
1:55 p.m.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative James Rajotte
You want a recorded vote on this.
(Amendment negatived [See Minutes of Proceedings])
If we can do one more before question period, we will do Liberal amendment 165-328.
2 p.m.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative James Rajotte
Okay, let's do it.
(Amendment negatived [See Minutes of Proceedings])
Colleagues, I will suspend until after question period. I will resume as soon as I have a quorum following question period, but I will suspend at this time.
Thank you.
3:20 p.m.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative James Rajotte
I call the 94th meeting of the Standing Committee on Finance back to order.
Pursuant to the order of reference of Tuesday, October 30, 2012, we're continuing our discussion of Bill C-45, A second Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 29, 2012 and other measures.
Colleagues, when we were last here we defeated Liberal amendment 165-328. I will therefore move to Liberal amendment 165-329.
Mr. Brison.
3:20 p.m.
Liberal
3:20 p.m.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative James Rajotte
Yes, you can.
(Amendment negatived [See Minutes of Proceedings])
The bells are ringing. As your chair, I need unanimous consent to keep the meeting going. Do I have that unanimous consent?
I do not have unanimous consent. I am sorry, but I will suspend the meeting. We will return after the vote.
Thank you
November 22nd, 2012 / 4:10 p.m.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative James Rajotte
I call this meeting back to order.
This is meeting number 94 of the Standing Committee on Finance. Pursuant to the order of reference of Tuesday, October 30, 2012, we're studying Bill C-45.
Colleagues, when we were last here we defeated Liberal amendment 165-329. Therefore, I will call the vote on Liberal 165-330.
On division?
Yes, Mr. Brison.
4:10 p.m.
Liberal
Scott Brison Liberal Kings—Hants, NS
Mr. Chair, I'd appreciate it if for this one we could go on division.
4:10 p.m.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative James Rajotte
Thank you, Mr. Brison.
(Amendment negatived on division [See Minutes of Proceedings])
We will now go to Liberal amendment 165-331.
Mr. Brison.
4:10 p.m.
Conservative
4:10 p.m.
Liberal
Scott Brison Liberal Kings—Hants, NS
You told me to mix it up.
(Amendment negatived [See Minutes of Proceedings])
4:10 p.m.
Liberal
Scott Brison Liberal Kings—Hants, NS
Mr. Chair, could we have a recorded vote on this one?
(Amendment negatived [See Minutes of Proceedings])
4:10 p.m.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative James Rajotte
We'll go to Liberal amendment 165-333.
On division?
(Amendment negatived on division [See Minutes of Proceedings])
We'll go to Liberal amendment 165-334.
Mr. Brison.
4:10 p.m.
Liberal
Scott Brison Liberal Kings—Hants, NS
Could we have a recorded vote on this, please?
(Amendment negatived [See Minutes of Proceedings])
4:10 p.m.
Conservative
4:10 p.m.
Liberal
Scott Brison Liberal Kings—Hants, NS
Could we please have a recorded vote on this?
(Amendment negatived [See Minutes of Proceedings])
4:10 p.m.
NDP
Wayne Marston NDP Hamilton East—Stoney Creek, ON
Some of our people here are too loud in the microphones, and it's really a serious problem for the hearing of our translators. I know it's not a typical point of order, but it's a point of concern for them. If perhaps the members could deliver, but without the force....