Transport committee  The amended motion reads as follows: That the committee undertake a meeting on infrastructure in Canada, and invite the following witnesses to appear before the committee within 14 days of this motion being adopted, for one hour each, separately: (a) The Minister of Environment and Climate Change; (b) The Minister of Housing, Infrastructure and Communities; (c) The Minister of Transport;

Transport committee  Yes. A second part was added and adopted, as follows: And that the committee seek additional resources, if necessary, to accommodate these appearances.

Transport committee  You are voting on the amendment as amended by Mr. Muys. The amendment is the one proposed by Mr. Barsalou-Duval. Instead of having “30 days”, you have “14 days”.

Transport committee  The motion reads: That the committee undertake a meeting on infrastructure in Canada, and invite the following witnesses to appear before the committee within 14 days of this motion being adopted...: (a) The Minister of Environment and Climate Change; (b) The Minister of Housing, Infrastructure and Communities; (c) The Minister of Transport....

Transport committee  Yes, if you don't mind.

Transport committee  I would like some clarification. Is it a motion to adjourn the meeting?

Transport committee  I won't read back the preamble, but the core of the motion would be that: ...the committee conduct a study pursuant to Standing Order 108(2) on the Canada Infrastructure Bank (CIB) involvement in the Lake Erie Connector project; that the study be comprised of no fewer than three meetings; that the committee invite the Chief Executive Officer of the Canada Infrastructure Bank (CIB), the Chief Investment Officer of the Canada Infrastructure Bank (CIB), and the Chief Financial Officer of the Canada Infrastructure Bank (CIB) to appear as witnesses for no less than two hours each; and that the committee report its findings to the House.

Transport committee  If you vote yes, then you sustain the decision of the chair. If you vote no, you are appealing the decision of the chair. (Ruling of the chair sustained: yeas 7; nays 4)

Transport committee  You're voting on challenging the ruling of the chair. If you vote yes, you are confirming the decision of the chair. If you vote no, you are contesting the decision of the chair.

Transport committee  Yes, for sure. I was explaining that if you are voting yes, you are confirming the decision of the chair. If you are voting no, you are voting against the decision of the chair.

Transport committee  Ms. Zarrillo has her—

Transport committee  Mr. Lewis, you will have to log off and log on, but we will have somebody from technical support help you out.

Transport committee  I sent it.

Transport committee  Yes.

Transport committee  Can you make sure that Ms. Bennett has received it?